From the Lean Startup methodology, MVP is defined as "Minimum Viable Product". When was the last time you tried a product and said, "man, this is so viable"? Probably never.
As builders and creators, it's time to challenge and rethink the dogma that seems to have been passed down from the heavens. Instead of settling for something merely viable, let's strive for something more, something better.
When consumers engage with a product, they don't just want it to be viable. They want something that provides real value and actually works. Whatever you build should be complete in terms of delivering the core value and solving the problem for your consumers.
In recent years, there has been a tendency to lean too far towards the "minimum" end of the MVP spectrum. Many products have been built as just a fragment, lacking the necessary traction to make a significant impact. This highlights the importance of creating something that truly solves a problem in a newly beneficial way.
So, let's challenge the notion of viability and shift our focus towards building products that offer substantial value and meet the needs of consumers. While simplicity and efficiency are important, it's equally vital to ensure that the product is complete and capable of delivering the core solution.
It makes sense, but at the same time, it is worth mentioning that sometimes, for any reason, the user experience, the functionality, and the sales story do not align perfectly. It is not ideal, but sometimes it is the only way to keep the business running, and it can still be an MVP if the goal is to align these in the future. The problem is when all three are disconnected irreversibly, and I agree with you.